Community Discussion: Have you ever faced a situation where the right legal decision might not align with the company's short-term business interests? How did you navigate it?

General Counsels talk about navigating legal decisions that conflict with business interests.

Community Discussion: Have you ever faced a situation where the right legal decision might not align with the company's short-term business interests? How did you navigate it?

Author:

Have you ever faced a situation where the right legal decision might not align with the company's short-term business interests? How did you navigate it?

 

General Counsel Responses:

  • Oh, this is a tough one. I remember a situation where pushing for a particular IP protection was legally sound but would've delayed a product launch. It was a tightrope walk between legal prudence and business urgency. Anyone else faced something similar?
    • Totally get that. We had a similar clash with our marketing team over some ad campaigns. Legally, they were borderline, but from a marketing perspective, they were gold. I insisted on revisions, but it wasn't a popular decision.
  • It's like walking on eggshells sometimes. We had a merger opportunity that was fantastic from a business standpoint, but there were some compliance red flags. I had to sit down with the CEO and lay out the long-term risks versus the short-term gains. It was intense!
    • Been there! It's all about communication, right? I've found that presenting alternatives helps. Like, 'We can't do this, but here's another way we can achieve a similar outcome without the legal risks.' Easier said than done, though.
  • Sometimes it feels like we're the 'party poopers' in the boardroom. 😅 But jokes aside, it's our job to look ahead and safeguard the company's interests. Even if it means unpopular decisions now.
    • So true! I always use the analogy of chess - sometimes you sacrifice a pawn to save the queen. It's about long-term strategy over short-term wins.
  • One thing I've learned is not just to say 'No' but to explain the 'Why' behind it. When the leadership understands the potential repercussions, they're more likely to align with the legal perspective, even if it's not the most attractive option.
    • Couldn't agree more. And sometimes, it's also about picking your battles. There are times when you might let smaller things slide in favor of bigger, more critical legal battles.
  • It's tough, especially when shareholders are breathing down your neck for quick returns. But I always remind myself - and my team - that we're the conscience of the company. If we don't uphold the legal and ethical standards, who will?
  • Such a relief to hear I'm not alone in this. We're often in the hot seat, making tough calls. But at the end of the day, protecting the company's integrity and reputation is paramount. It's a weighty responsibility, but that's why we're here, right?

 

Give us your response and be a part of the discussion.

Share post:
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments