OpenAI Faces New Copyright Infringement Suit Amid Publisher Licensing Talks

From lawsuits to licenses: OpenAI charts a new course in the content landscape.

OpenAI Faces New Copyright Infringement Suit Amid Publisher Licensing Talks

OpenAI, the research lab behind powerful artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT, finds itself caught in a double-edged sword: facing a new copyright infringement lawsuit while simultaneously holding licensing talks with major publishers. This dual scenario presents both challenges and opportunities for OpenAI as it navigates the complex landscape of AI-generated content.

OpenAI's Copyright Concerns

OpenAI's new copyright lawsuit, filed by journalists Nicholas Basbanes and Adam Higginbotham, adds another layer to the already intricate debate surrounding AI and intellectual property. The complaint alleges that OpenAI's LLMs, specifically ChatGPT and Codex, incorporated substantial passages from the authors' non-fiction works without proper attribution or licensing. This raises several key concerns:

Scope of Infringement

The lawsuit details specific instances where passages from Basbanes' "A Masterpiece in the Making: Benjamin Franklin and the Creation of The Pennsylvania Gazette" and Higginbotham's "Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the Worst Nuclear Disaster in History" appeared verbatim in outputs generated by OpenAI's models. This raises questions about the extent of unauthorized copying within OpenAI's training data and its potential impact on other copyrighted works.

Fair Use Arguments

OpenAI may attempt to defend its actions under the "fair use" doctrine, which allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, or education. However, the applicability of fair use in this case is unclear. The substantial length of allegedly copied passages and the commercial nature of OpenAI's technology cast doubt on whether such use qualifies as transformative or beneficial to society.

Impact on Creative Economy

This lawsuit underscores the potential threat that AI poses to the livelihoods of creators like Basbanes and Higginbotham. If AI models can freely access and repurpose copyrighted materials without compensation, it could devalue creative work and undermine the incentive for future creation. This concern extends beyond journalism, encompassing artists, musicians, and authors across various domains.

OpenAI's Response and Potential Solutions

OpenAI has not yet publicly commented on the lawsuit. However, the company has previously acknowledged the importance of addressing copyright concerns. Its efforts toward content licensing with publishers may be seen as a step towards a more responsible approach to data acquisition and utilization. 

Ultimately, OpenAI will need to develop robust safeguards and transparent practices to ensure its technology respects intellectual property rights and fosters a sustainable ecosystem for both AI and creative endeavors.

Seeking Publisher Partnerships

In stark contrast to the lawsuits, OpenAI is also reportedly in talks with numerous publishers to explore content licensing arrangements. These discussions suggest a potential shift towards collaboration with rights holders, aiming to address copyright concerns and ensure the ethical use of copyrighted material in AI training. Such partnerships could provide publishers with a new revenue stream while giving OpenAI access to high-quality data for its models.

Tom Rubin, OpenAI's chief of intellectual property and content, confirmed the ongoing discussions. "We are in the middle of many negotiations and discussions with many publishers. They are active. They are positive They’re progressing well. You’ve seen deals announced, and there will be more in the future," he said. This comes on the heels of recent, high-profile deals with Axel Springer (Politico's parent company) and the Associated Press, involving multi-million-dollar licensing agreements.

Navigating the Gray Areas

The legal and ethical implications of AI-generated content remain ambiguous, with questions swirling around ownership, fair use, and potential plagiarism. OpenAI's current situation reflects this tension, highlighting the need for clear guidelines and frameworks for utilizing copyrighted material in training AI models.

Potential Outcomes

The copyright lawsuits could force OpenAI to refine its data acquisition and filtering methods, potentially leading to changes in how its LLMs are trained. Meanwhile, successful publisher partnerships could set a precedent for ethical collaboration in the AI industry, ensuring the responsible use of copyrighted materials in research and development.

It's still too early to predict the definitive outcome of either legal battle or the licensing talks. However, OpenAI's current situation raises crucial questions about the future of AI and its relationship with creative content. The resolution of these challenges will have far-reaching implications for both the AI industry and the intellectual property landscape.

Share post: Logo
Welcome to

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments Logo
Welcome to

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments