Key points:
- Law students from 18 U.S. law schools have asked the American Bar Association to engage on accelerating law firm recruitment timelines.
- The students warn early hiring undermines legal education, student well-being, and the integrity of the recruitment market.
- The issue has intensified since the pandemic and after the retirement of national recruiting guidelines in 2018.
Law students from nearly 20 U.S. law schools are pressing the American Bar Association to address what they describe as an increasingly compressed and disruptive law firm recruitment cycle, according to a letter sent to the ABA on Jan. 1 and reported by the Yale Daily News.
The letter, organized by members of the Yale Graduate and Professional Student Senate and signed by student groups at 18 law schools, argues that accelerated recruiting timelines are “beginning to undermine legal education, student and staff well-being, and the recruitment market.” It calls for dialogue with the ABA’s Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar on whether guardrails are needed.
At issue is the race among large law firms to secure top talent earlier each year. Students say some firms are now recruiting first-year law students for second-year summer associate roles as early as October of their 1L year — a shift that forces career-defining decisions before many students have completed a single semester of law school.
The dynamic mirrors trends long seen in consulting and investment banking, where early recruiting has become a competitive necessity. In legal hiring, however, the acceleration has been especially pronounced since the pandemic disrupted traditional on-campus interview schedules and informal coordination among firms.
That coordination largely disappeared in 2018, when the National Association for Law Placement formally retired its voluntary recruiting guidelines amid concerns that timing rules among competing employers could raise antitrust issues. Since then, NALP has stepped back from managing recruiting calendars, leaving firms and schools without a shared framework, as previously outlined in NALP’s public guidance on recruiting practices.
In a statement shared with the student organizers, ABA Managing Director for Accreditation and Legal Education Jennifer Rosato Perea said the council has received the letter and plans to follow up with student representatives.
Law school administrators are also acknowledging the strain. Yale Law School Assistant Dean Kelly Voight said the January hiring of 1Ls for 2L summer roles has created challenges for students, schools, and firms alike, affecting academics, career exploration, and well-being, even as demand for top candidates remains strong.
Student leaders say the letter is intended less as a rebuke than as a starting point. With no centralized system governing timing, they argue, the risk is a recruiting market that prioritizes speed over informed decision-making — a concern increasingly relevant to large firms and corporate legal departments competing for the same early talent.









