Twitter Faces Legal Battle Over $90 Million Fee in Elon Musk Acquisition

Twitter faces a legal showdown over a $90 million fee tied to Elon Musk's $44 billion acquisition. The lawsuit, against law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, centers on claims of 'unjust enrichment' amidst a backdrop of high-stakes corporate disputes and high-profile acquisitions.

Twitter Faces Legal Battle Over $90 Million Fee in Elon Musk Acquisition

Twitter is embroiled in a legal tussle over the hefty fees related to Elon Musk's $44 billion acquisition of the platform. The social media giant's parent company, X Corp., filed a lawsuit against the prominent Wall Street law firm, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. The suit claims a $90 million payment made to the firm was "unjust enrichment" and demands its return.

The lawsuit, lodged in San Francisco Superior Court, alleges that Wachtell Lipton extracted the significant fee "from the company cash register while the keys were being handed over" to Musk, the owner of X Corp. The legal firm was initially hired by Twitter's earlier management when Musk attempted to terminate his acquisition agreement. Despite his efforts, the acquisition was finalized in October of the previous year.

It's worth noting that Twitter has been challenging multiple fees in relation to Musk's acquisition. Earlier, advisory firm Innisfree M&A and PR firm Joele Frank also filed lawsuits against Twitter, claiming unpaid bills and services.

Wachtell Lipton's reputation precedes it, known for advising top-tier deals, including Musk's unsuccessful bid to privatize Tesla in 2018. Their expertise comes at a premium, placing them among the top-earning law firms. This isn't the firm's first brush with legal challenges. They were sued in 2018 by investor Carl Icahn over their involvement in his 2012 takeover bid for CVR Energy, although that suit was eventually dismissed.

The lawsuit's documents highlight that Twitter's leadership approved the $90 million payment, crediting Wachtell Lipton and attorney William Savitt for ensuring Musk honored his acquisition agreement. The suit alleges that this approval was a breach of fiduciary duty by the former Twitter board and executives. They purportedly hurried the deal with Musk without due diligence or adequate information. Shockingly, a large portion of the $90 million fee was transferred to Wachtell Lipton just minutes before the acquisition was sealed. Soon after this, Musk made swift executive changes at Twitter, ousting key players, including the chief legal officer.

While the $90 million fee might seem exorbitant, it's essential to frame it in perspective. When Wachtell was brought on board, Twitter's market valuation was at a $14 billion deficit compared to what Musk had committed to paying. By ensuring Musk's full payment, the law firm effectively boosted Twitter shareholders' value by $14 billion. The contentious fee is roughly 0.6% of this increased value.

The saga underscores the vast sums involved in high-profile acquisitions and the perceived value of elite legal counsel in navigating such deals.

For an engaging and in-depth overview of this latest chapter in the Elon Musk - Twitter sage, see this video by LegalEagle.

 

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


New York State Limits Remedies for Breach of Nondisclosure Provisions in Settlement Agreements
New York State Limits Remedies for Breach of Nondisclosure Provisions in Settlement Agreements

New York State has banned liquidated damages and clawback provisions designed to protect confidentiality.

Nov 30, 2023
Read More
Near-Record Profits for Law Firms in Q3 2024

Law firms reported an 11.2% profit increase in Q3 2024, fueled by higher lawyer productivity and strong billing rates. Demand across various practices also contributed to the growth.

Nov 12, 2024
Read More
Visual Artists' Copyright Case Against AI Companies Moves Forward

U.S. District Judge William Orrick’s ruling allows visual artists to proceed with copyright infringement claims against AI companies like Stability AI and Midjourney.

Aug 16, 2024
Read More
Community Discussion: How do you draft and enforce a social media policy for employees that balances free speech with company reputation?
Community Discussion: How do you draft and enforce a social media policy for employees that balances free speech with company reputation?

Generals Counsel discuss how they enforce a company social media policy without infringing on personal rights.

Jan 04, 2024
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.