AI Legal Battles Voice Rights

Recent legal cases, including Scarlett Johansson's accusation against OpenAI and a class action lawsuit against LOVO, highlight the need for legal regulation in voice AI technology.

AI Legal Battles Voice Rights

Recent legal accusations by actress Scarlet Johansson & other voice actors emphasize the need for legal regulation in voice acting.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming how we interact with technology. One area of particular growth is voice technology, with AI-powered voices becoming commonplace in virtual assistants, audiobooks, and even customer service applications. But this progress is accompanied by a growing legal gray area: the unauthorized use of a person's voice in AI.

The legal issues surrounding voice in AI are multifaceted. Copyright law plays a role, but often the more relevant concern is the Right of Publicity. This protects an individual's control over the commercial use of their likeness, including their voice.

Recent Legal Battles

The legal battles surrounding voice in AI are only just beginning. Two cases highlight the complexities:

Scarlett Johansson vs. OpenAI

Scarlett Johansson accused OpenAI of creating an AI voice for ChatGPT that sounded eerily similar to her. “When I heard the released demo, I was shocked, angered and in disbelief that Mr. Altman would pursue a voice that sounded so eerily similar to mine,” Johansson said. OpenAI later apologized and paused the voice mode named “Sky.” 

The controversy highlights the need to avoid deliberate mimicry of celebrity voices. While OpenAI’s intentions were not malicious, it underscores the importance of transparency and consent when using AI-generated voices.

LOVO’s Class Action Lawsuit

Voiceover actors Paul Skye Lehrman and Linnea Sage filed a class action lawsuit against AI startup LOVO. They claim LOVO misappropriated their voices and those of other celebrities, including Johansson, Ariana Grande, and Conan O’Brien. This case emphasizes the legal risks associated with using AI voices without proper authorization.

“LOVO purports to compensate voice actors,” Pollock Cohen attorneys Steve Cohen and Anna Menkova wrote in the complaint. “That may be true in some cases. But plaintiffs and other members of the class have received no revenue from the continued unauthorized use of their voices by LOVO and LOVO clients.”

Legal Issues Surrounding AI Voice Technology

Some of the key legal issues surrounding AI voice technology include:

Rights of Publicity

Performers have rights to their names, voices, and likenesses. These “rights of publicity” extend even post-mortem in many U.S. states, including New York. Unauthorized use of a performer’s voice could infringe on these rights. When an AI generates a voice that closely resembles a celebrity, it raises questions about whether the AI is exploiting their likeness without permission.

Consumer Protection Laws

Misleading advertising and “passing off” (presenting something as another) can lead to legal action. AI-generated voices must not deceive consumers or misrepresent products or services. For example, if an AI voice is used in a commercial without proper disclosure, it could violate consumer protection laws.

Guild and Union Agreements

Contracts between performers and studios often govern voice performances. These agreements outline compensation, exclusivity, and other terms. When AI-generated voices are used, studios and developers must consider whether they comply with existing contracts. If an AI voice mimics a unionized actor’s voice, it could lead to disputes.

The Future of Voice and the Law

These cases underscore the need for clearer legal frameworks surrounding voice use in AI. Some proposed solutions include:

  • "Right of Voice" Legislation: Several US states are considering legislation that would grant individuals a specific "Right of Voice" alongside the Right of Publicity.

  • Transparency and Disclosure: Requiring developers to be transparent about AI-generated voices and obtain proper licensing could be a step forward.

The unauthorized use of voice in AI presents a complex legal challenge. As AI technology continues to evolve, so too must the laws governing its use. By ensuring robust legal frameworks that protect individual rights while fostering innovation, we can navigate this uncharted territory and ensure the ethical development of voice AI.

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


Four Practices to Power Big Law Growth in 2024
Four Practices to Power Big Law Growth in 2024

Antitrust, M&A, litigation, and restructuring drive Big Law's growth engine this year.

Jan 04, 2024
Read More
GrokAI: Elon Musk’s Rebellious AI
GrokAI: Elon Musk’s Rebellious AI

GrokAI launched to fill the gap that other AI language models has left open.

Nov 06, 2023
Read More
6 Things That Turn a Good Job into an Amazing Job
6 Things That Turn a Good Job into an Amazing Job

Some of us dislike our job. Others are happy enough with it. But still other people love what they do to earn their bread. What is it that people get from a job that enables them to derive joy from it? Of course, the answer is different for everyone. But thinking about the things that most often bring contentment at work for different people helps us work out the answer for ourselves. Let’s have a look at the most frequently cited elements in what turns a good job into a great one. 

Jul 28, 2020
Read More
U.S. Judge Uses AI in Legal Interpretation Experiment

A federal judge turned to AI programs to interpret a key legal term in a man's appeal of his more than 11-year prison sentence, and despite being “spooked” by variances, concluded that the software could be a "valuable" tool.

Sep 09, 2024
Read More
Federal Court Strips Privilege From AI-Generated Legal Documents in First-of-Its-Kind Ruling

A Manhattan judge's decision in United States v. Heppner delivers a clear warning to corporate legal teams: using public AI tools like Claude or ChatGPT for legal queries is not protected by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine.

Feb 26, 2026
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.