Community Perspectives: How strict are listed requirements for in-house jobs?

In-house legal professionals discuss the amount of leniency candidates should consider when comparing their skills to a job description.

Community Perspectives: How strict are listed requirements for in-house jobs?

(Author) Associate

How strict are listed experience requirements for in-house counsel jobs? I’ve got 4.5 years of BigLaw employment experience with a lot of autonomy in my cases that I can demonstrate in an interview. Should I apply for in-house employment jobs seeking 6-8 years of experience?

General Counsel Responses:

  • Yes, apply.

  • Yes.

  • Always apply. Best of luck to you.

  • I agree with everyone else, apply. Also, where are you located? The company I work for has a L&E openings in the DC area.

Counsel Responses:

  • Do it. You've got this 💪🏻! After so many years of experience, personality is what really matters for me.

  • You should definitely apply. But also know that jobs often get applicants with much more experience (eg, I was hired with seven years of experience for a job listed as three plus years of experience), so it’s going to be competitive.

  • I would use the buzzwords from the posting. Remember, it has to get past HR/software before someone looks at it.

  • You can definitely apply. In my experience when hiring for more typical practice groups (like L&E) companies have a lot of room to go outside the listed years of experience but, more often, they end up hiring someone with more experience than the job listing requires. All that being said, don’t discount postings asking for less years of experience. If they like you and want to bring you on, they’ll adjust the title and compensation.

  • I literally got my last job with four years of experience and it asked for six to eight. My experience was super relevant and for in-house, they’re often just guessing on experience range, especially at smaller places.

  • You should definitely apply! There is no need to worry about the experience difference.

  • Apply. But also, watch those typos- “council” when referring to attorneys is like nails on a chalkboard to me.

Attorney and Associate Responses:

  • They aren't strict at all.

  • Yes!

In-house? Be a part of the conversation on Fishbowl (anonymous).

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


Big Law Partner Pay Entering “Whole Different World” as 2024 Closes

After 2024, “it’s a whole different world” when it comes to Big Law compensation, as more than one third of Am Law 200 and beyond plan to make changes to their equity partner compensation models, either by stretching the spread or revising compensation criteria.

Dec 16, 2024
Read More
Allen & Overy Announces Legal AI Product - Harvey
Allen & Overy Announces Legal AI Product - Harvey

The AI product will eventually become available to all A&O firms worldwide.

Feb 17, 2023
Read More
The Evolving Landscape of Cyber Threats: Safeguarding Strategies in the Era of AI Models
The Evolving Landscape of Cyber Threats: Safeguarding Strategies in the Era of AI Models

In today's digital age, the ever-evolving nature of cyber threats poses significant challenges for organizations striving to maintain robust security. With the advent of AI models, the threat landscape has become more sophisticated, demanding adaptive strategies to safeguard sensitive data and protect against potential breaches. In this blog post, we explore the next generation of cyber threats and offer practical insights on adapting security measures to stay ahead in this dynamic environment.

Jul 14, 2023
Read More
AI Hallucinations Land Butler Snow in Hot Water in Alabama Prison Case

A federal judge is weighing sanctions against Butler Snow after one of its lawyers used ChatGPT-generated fake case citations in a high-profile Alabama prison lawsuit.

May 24, 2025
Read More
Match.com Defeats Final Patent Infringement Claim from British Telecom

A Delaware court rules against BT’s final claim, finding Match.com did not infringe under § 101. The decision reaffirms limits on abstract patents in digital services.

Aug 08, 2025
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.