Class Actions Allege Crypto-Trading Platforms Collected Facial Scans Without Written Notice

Crypto platforms could face claims worth billions of dollars for violating users' privacy.

Class Actions Allege Crypto-Trading Platforms Collected Facial Scans Without Written Notice

In a groundbreaking development, several class-action lawsuits have been filed against crypto-trading platforms, alleging that these platforms collected facial scans of users without notifying them. This marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate about privacy and security in the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrency.

The lawsuits allege that the facial scans were collected without users’ explicit consent or written notice. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants failed to comply with the law, which is intended to protect investors from unscrupulous behavior. This is a serious breach of privacy, raising concerns about how personal data is being used and protected in the crypto industry.

The lawsuits name several crypto-asset exchanges and digital token issuers as defendants, including Coinbase, Binance, Bibox, BitMEX, and KuCoin, as well as seven issuers of digital tokens: Block.one, Tron, Bancor, Civic, Kybercoin, Quantstamp, and Status. 

The Future of Crypto-Trading Platforms

The outcome of these lawsuits could potentially reshape the landscape of crypto-trading platforms. If the courts rule that these platforms have indeed violated securities laws and breached user privacy, it could lead to a major overhaul in how these platforms operate. This could include stricter regulations, increased transparency, and enhanced security measures.

Moreover, these lawsuits could serve as a wake-up call for other crypto-trading platforms. They highlight the importance of adhering to securities laws and respecting user privacy. Moving forward, crypto-trading platforms may need to be more diligent in ensuring they comply with all relevant laws and regulations.

The Consequences of BIPA Violations

The consequences of violating the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) can be severe. The Act authorizes statutory damages of $1,000 for each negligent violation or $5,000 for each intentional or reckless violation. In addition to these statutory damages, individuals may also seek injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, and other litigation expenses.

These companies often store facial data of thousands if not millions of individuals. If the court finds that the violations of BIPA were willful, these companies could potentially face damages in the millions or even billions of dollars.

This serves as a stark reminder of the importance of data privacy, especially in the realm of cryptocurrencies. As the crypto market continues to grow, it is crucial for trading platforms to prioritize user privacy and adhere to data protection laws. This not only helps maintain trust among users but also ensures the security of their personal and financial information.

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


Unleashing the Power of AI: A New Era for In-House Legal Teams
Unleashing the Power of AI: A New Era for In-House Legal Teams

The legal landscape is undergoing a transformative shift with the advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI), a powerful tool that is reshaping the role of in-house counsel.

Oct 16, 2023
Read More
Tech Firms Target PTO's Discretionary Denials with Rare Mandamus Appeals

SAP and Motorola challenge the PTO’s patent review procedures at the Federal Circuit, testing the limits of mandamus in a clash over PTAB authority.

Jul 02, 2025
Read More
August 6, 2021 Report: Legal Jobs See a Huge Recovery in Jobs Lost During Pandemic
August 6, 2021 Report: Legal Jobs See a Huge Recovery in Jobs Lost During Pandemic

The latest Bureau of Labor Statistics jobs report showed roughly one million jobs were added in July.

Aug 13, 2021
Read More
AI Meeting Tools Raise Privacy, Privilege, And Discovery Risks For Employers

Employers adopting AI meeting-transcription tools face growing risks around privacy, privilege, and discoverability, prompting calls for governance, training, and vendor oversight.

Dec 10, 2025
Read More
Quinn Emanuel founding partner talks AI

John Quinn, founding partner, discusses a proprietary AI tool, built on Anthropic, that can be used in litigation to prepare expert witness reports, examination outlines, etc.

Mar 06, 2026
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.