California Rejects the NCBE Exam

The State Bar of California is considering replacing the National Conference of Bar Examiners' test with a locally developed bar exam in partnership with Kaplan North America LLC.

California Rejects the NCBE Exam

The State Bar of California is on the verge of rejecting the national bar exam, a decision driven by a desire to manage its budget prudently.

The State Bar of California Board of Trustees is set to consider an agreement allowing California, with the assistance of Kaplan North America LLC, to develop and administer its own bar exam. This would replace the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ (NCBE) test or the incoming NextGen exam.

The decision comes after state bar staff explored the prospect of transitioning to an alternative, cost-effective exam administration approach. This could potentially involve a fully remote online exam, beginning with the February 2025 bar exam administration. The Committee of Bar Examiners then voted in April to recommend to the Board of Trustees that the state bar retain a new vendor to develop bar exam questions to replace the current MBE.

The Bar Seeks $1.475M for the Development of the Exam

During the upcoming meeting, the bar will seek authorization for the board chair and the Executive Director to finalize negotiations and enter into an agreement of a maximum of $1.475M annually for five years. This agreement is being negotiated between the state bar and Kaplan, for the development of multiple-choice, essays, and performance test questions for the California Bar Exam.

The Financial Implications of the Bar Exam

While exam development costs are anticipated to increase initially, the transition will facilitate significant overall savings through the adoption of alternative exam administration approaches. The “as-is” cost of bar exam question development and administration in 2025 will total approximately $8.4M while the cost of purchasing multiple-choice questions from the NCBE and exam development is roughly $1M annually.

The NCBE respects the role of each state’s admission authority to determine that state’s licensure standards. Sophie Martin, NCBE’s director of communications, stated they will continue to support California, its applicants, and its law schools however they can.

The Future of Exam Administration

The State Bar of California is also exploring vendors that could provide the option of administering the bar fully remote or by hybrid administration. A fully remote administration approach would alleviate costly and labor-intensive tasks such as securing and managing large exam facilities and the recruitment and compensation of proctors. However, Martin noted that the NCBE administers the MBE as a paper-and-pencil exam in 54 jurisdictions.

Martin also noted that although California is not a UBE jurisdiction, 12 jurisdictions currently accept transferred MBE scores from California candidates who wish to be licensed in those jurisdictions. Therefore, this score portability would be lost if California stopped offering the MBE.

The NextGen Bar Exam

The NextGen bar exam, which the NCBE plans to launch with the July 2026 administration, is the product of the input of more than 15,000 U.S. attorneys, judges, justices, and legal educators. Currently, 17 U.S. states have adopted the NextGen bar exam. However, the State Bar of Nevada has also indicated a desire to transition away from the MBE.

The State Bar of California’s decision to reject the national bar exam and develop its own could have significant implications for the future of bar exams in the United States. It represents a shift towards more cost-effective and independent approaches to licensing tests. However, the success of this initiative will depend on the effectiveness of the new exam and its acceptance by other jurisdictions.

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


Big Law Gets Bigger, and So Do Expenses
Big Law Gets Bigger, and So Do Expenses

The 400 largest US firms show headcount growth again after two years of sluggishness, with an average growth rate of 2.2%, while operating expenses increased by 6.8%.

May 22, 2024
Read More
Law Firm Partner De-Equitizations Expected to Continue Into 2025

Multiple Am Law 100 firms, as well as midsize and regional law firms, have de-equitized partners in recent months in what is widely described as “sound financial management of the firm“.

Dec 05, 2024
Read More
Perkins Coie Sues Trump Administration Over Executive Order Targeting Law Firm

Perkins Coie sues the Trump administration over an executive order that it says unlawfully strips security clearances, cancels federal contracts, and threatens its business.

Mar 12, 2025
Read More
More Lawyers Leaving Big Tech for Big Law as Pay Gap Narrows

The pay gap between Big Law and Big Tech is narrowing, and lawyers for technology companies are increasingly migrating to law firms to capitalize on this trend.

Sep 27, 2024
Read More
4 Basic Tools Every In-House Legal Team Needs
4 Basic Tools Every In-House Legal Team Needs

Legal Operations is a fairly recent addition to the legal industry, and, as a department tasked with managing and streamlining the efforts of in-house counsel, they have their work cut out for them. Although there are many options for Legal Operations, in this article we will focus on the 4 most effective tools to help in-house legal departments. Keep in mind, these solutions may vary from business to business, but this list generally addresses all in-house legal department needs.

Apr 13, 2020
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.