Law Firms Turn to Partner Pay Cuts to Preserve Top Talent

Even as top law firms have reached new revenue and profitability peaks, between 10% and 30% of partners are making less money year to year, as firms focus on retaining top performers.

  • Up to 30% of partners may face annual pay reductions, despite strong overall financials.

  • Competitive compensation for top-performing partners is driving more firms to adjust earnings at lower levels.

  • Managing partner expectations has become routine for law firms navigating profit distribution challenges.

Amid strong financial performance and revenue peaks this year, top law firms are implementing sharper pay cuts for certain partners to maintain competitive compensation for their most profitable performers, according to a Law.com report.

  • Between 10% and 30% of partners at large firms can expect year-to-year pay reductions, and some firms are some firms are producing faster moves down, helping them pay top performers.

  • This is a departure from the more collegial days of partnerships, when it was unheard of to cut a partner's compensation, according to law firm management consultants.

A Routine Practice

This strategy, designed to keep top performers satisfied and avoid defections, is becoming a routine practice in Big Law. 

Law firms are more directly tying business to compensation each year. But many partners, even unproductive ones, are still benefiting from a "peanut buttering" of profitability as the value of a firm's points or shares grows.

Fairfax Associates consultant Kristin Stark said a significant number of partners moving down are retiring or phasing out their practices, so it's not unexpected for them or the firm. "Most law firms will experience substantial growth in profitability this year, and law firms are busy, so the people going down are generally people transitioning out of the practice," she said.

Point Adjustments

Even middle and lower-performing partners have benefited from the ramp-up in financial performance over the last three to four years, largely due to the points system, where the number of points they have at a firm has increased in value even if their performance hasn’t.

"If you don't reduce their points, the payout on those points is not justified by the revenue they're bringing," said Matthew Bersani, a founding partner of Cliff Group, a legal consulting firm.

According to Chicago-based recruiter Susan Mendelsohn, if partners are going down from year to year at a profitable firm, it's likely not baked into the firm's economics but related more to a sustained decline in the partner's hours, business generation, and profitability. 

"If you're going down in compensation as a partner, it's because you're not bringing in as much business as you did when you were compensated more," she said.

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


Community Discussion: Can you share your experiences and best practices for negotiating high-stakes deals?
Community Discussion: Can you share your experiences and best practices for negotiating high-stakes deals?

Commercial Counsel discuss their best practices for negotiating high-stakes deals in their practice.

Dec 04, 2023
Read More
California High Court Holds AI Vendors Liable for Biased Job Screening
California High Court Holds AI Vendors Liable for Biased Job Screening

AI vendors are directly accountable for violations under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.

Sep 06, 2023
Read More
Community Perspectives: Has anyone gone in-house with no law firm experience?
Community Perspectives: Has anyone gone in-house with no law firm experience?

In-house legal professionals talk about whether or not they had law firm experience prior to going in-house.

Feb 09, 2023
Read More
Legal.io Newsletter - June 18, 2021
Legal.io Newsletter - June 18, 2021

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.

Jun 18, 2021
Read More
AI Copyright Infringement Suit Proceeds in California District Court
AI Copyright Infringement Suit Proceeds in California District Court

In an early test of the interplay between artificial intelligence (AI) and copyright law, the US District Court for the Northern District of California recently allowed a copyright infringement claim to proceed against an AI developer that used an artist’s works without authorization to train a machine learning model.

Nov 23, 2023
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.