Court Pauses KPMG’s Bid to Deliver Legal Services in Arizona

The Arizona Supreme Court is asking Big Four firm KPMG for more details on its bid to deliver legal services in the state, under an alternative business structure program. There are yet no specifics or timeframe as to when the court will make a final decision.

Key points:

  • KPMG would be the first Big Four accounting firm to deliver legal services in the U.S. under Arizona’s alternative business structure program.
  • The firm plans to operate within Arizona’s regulatory framework but faces questions on compliance in other states.
  • No timeline has been given for a final ruling.

The Arizona Supreme Court has put KPMG’s bid to establish a law firm on hold, requesting further information before making a final decision, Bloomberg Law reports.

  • The court was expected to rule on KPMG’s application this week, following a recommendation from Arizona’s Alternative Business Structures (ABS) committee. Instead, it has asked the firm to clarify aspects of its proposal, leaving the timeline for a decision uncertain.
  • “The KPMG application remains under review,” said Alberto Rodriguez, the court’s communications director. He added that there are “no specifics or timeframe” on when a final ruling will be made.
  • KPMG, which had not immediately commented on the development, is seeking to become the first Big Four accounting firm to deliver legal services in the U.S.

Regulatory Challenges

Arizona is one of the few U.S. states that allow nonlawyer ownership of law firms through its ABS program, which was launched in 2021 to expand access to legal services. The program permits law firms to share ownership with business professionals, a departure from the traditional attorney-only model.

Utah has a similar but temporary regulatory sandbox, while Washington state recently announced a 10-year pilot program exploring nonlawyer firm ownership, according to Law.com.

Despite receiving committee approval, KPMG’s plan has raised regulatory questions. Committee members at a Jan. 14 meeting asked how KPMG Law US—its proposed legal division—would provide services in states that do not allow fee-sharing with nonlawyers.

  • David Rizzo, KPMG Law US’s designated compliance lawyer, said the firm would rely on staffing agencies and co-counsel agreements to serve clients in jurisdictions outside Arizona.
  • “It’s going to be my job to ensure that Arizona lawyers are not holding themselves out as lawyers in other jurisdictions,” Rizzo told the committee. “We are aware of the kind of trouble that sloppy operations can get us in.”

While KPMG’s application remains under review, the firm’s potential approval could open the door for other Big Four firms to follow suit.

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


Legal.io Newsletter - October 1, 2021
Legal.io Newsletter - October 1, 2021

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.

Oct 01, 2021
Read More
Community Perspectives: What do you keep in-house and what do you outsource to outside counsel?
Community Perspectives: What do you keep in-house and what do you outsource to outside counsel?

In-house legal professionals talk about how they manage in-house vs. outside counsel duties.

Feb 23, 2023
Read More
Community Perspectives: What is your contract approval process?
Community Perspectives: What is your contract approval process?

The sole in-house counsel at a legal technology company inquires about the contract approval process in similarly sized legal departments.

Nov 13, 2020
Read More
BigLaw Billing Rates Surge Past $3,400 an Hour as Partner Fees Hit New Records

Partner billing rates at the 50 largest US law firms rose 16% last year, with some partners now commanding $4,000+ per hour. The data is forcing corporate legal departments to rethink outside counsel strategy.

Feb 27, 2026
Read More
California Bar Seeks to Expand Supervised Practice Program Amid Exam Fallout

The California Bar has petitioned the state Supreme Court to expand its provisional licensing program to help 3,340 applicants affected by the troubled February 2025 exam.

May 24, 2025
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.