California Bar Exam Faces Technical and Logistical Hurdles

California will roll out its new bar exam on Feb. 25, but test takers have already encountered technical and logistical problems ranging from crashed computers and distracting online proctors on mock exams to an inability to schedule their tests.

Key points:

  • Bar candidates report issues with scheduling, online proctoring, and test registration.
  • Limited in-person testing sites are forcing some examinees to travel long distances.
  • Communication from the State Bar and Meazure Learning has been inconsistent.
  • The new exam format is expected to save costs, but early implementation has been problematic.

California’s newly redesigned bar exam is set to launch on February 25, but test takers are already encountering technical and logistical challenges, according to a Reuters report.

Issues include difficulties scheduling exams, technical malfunctions during mock tests, and disruptions caused by online proctors.

The high-stakes exam, which over 5,300 candidates must pass to become licensed attorneys, marks California’s break from the national Uniform Bar Exam. The shift was intended to reduce costs but has led to early frustrations.

Cost Savings vs. Candidate Frustration

The California Bar fast-tracked its new exam last August, expecting to save up to $3.8 million annually by eliminating the need for large event venues.

The test allows candidates to choose between remote or in-person testing, with 67% opting for the remote format. However, the early rollout has exposed potential pitfalls.

Candidates have taken to Reddit and other online forums to share complaints and find workarounds, highlighting the lack of clear communication from administrators. With less than a month to go before the exam, test takers remain concerned about the reliability of the system on exam day.

Scheduling Challenges and System Glitches

Many candidates have struggled to book their exam slots through Meazure Learning, the company contracted to administer the test.

  • Some reported that the online system crashed during scheduling.
  • Others found fewer in-person testing locations than expected.
  • There are only four large in-person sites—San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, and Sacramento—forcing some test takers to travel long distances.

For those opting to take the test remotely, technical problems have added another layer of concern. Santa Clara law graduate Gino Mazzoni described the process as “absurd,” citing distractions from proctors talking during mock exams. He eventually abandoned the remote option after repeated issues.

Bar Officials Acknowledge Issues

The State Bar of California and Meazure Learning have acknowledged technical difficulties but claim they have resolved them. A spokesperson for the Bar said that registration problems were fixed within a day, but candidates remain wary.

Harshita Ganesh, a Georgetown law graduate, said the process has been much more difficult than her experience with the Uniform Bar Exam in another state. She still doesn’t know where she will be taking the test, as scheduling issues persist.

“This entire process has been horrible,” Ganesh said.

Customer Stories

See how leading enterprise in-house teams have scaled smarter with Legal.io's high-caliber flex talent.

More from Legal.io


Legal.io Newsletter - July 30, 2021
Legal.io Newsletter - July 30, 2021

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.

Jul 30, 2021
Read More
Legal Tech Booms: Harvey Hits $3B Valuation, Eve Raises $47M
Legal Tech Booms: Harvey Hits $3B Valuation, Eve Raises $47M

Legal tech funding reached record numbers in 2024, and the trend continues. Harvey doubled its valuation to $3 billion after raising $300M, while Eve secured a $47M Series A.

Jan 21, 2025
Read More
L-1A Guidelines Clarified, USCIS Gets Reprimanded
L-1A Guidelines Clarified, USCIS Gets Reprimanded

The Administrative Appeals Office (“AAO”), where USCIS decisions get appealed, gave a decision that not only clarified the standards for approving L-1A visas, but also reprimanded USCIS for constantly applying a more difficult and incorrect standard.

Aug 19, 2015
Read More
Associate Hiring Trends Diverge Between Large and Midsize Law Firms
Associate Hiring Trends Diverge Between Large and Midsize Law Firms

The legal industry's approach to associate hiring is seeing a pronounced divergence between large and midsize firms.

Jan 17, 2024
Read More
Ironclad Names Former DocuSign CEO Dan Springer as New Chief Executive

Ironclad appoints former DocuSign CEO Dan Springer as its new chief executive, positioning the company for its next phase of AI-driven growth in contract management.

Apr 28, 2025
Read More
Ready to hire?

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your hiring needs.

Free 15-min consultation
Legal.io Platform
5 star reviews
Hiring made smarter

Easy-to-use platform for hiring legal talent, managing spend, and optimizing your panel — plus an average savings of 50%.

Need Immediate Help?

Submit a hiring request and let our experts handle the entire process for you.